In praise of the disclaimer
A while ago I read a blogger's comment regarding Linda Hirshman's book "Get To Work" (an argument against women leaving the workforce to raise their children); she (the blogger) wrote, in part: ". . . it is kind of nice to read someone with actual opinions instead of the wimpy "whatever is right for your family" standard disclaimer".
Yeah, that whole business about not judging other people's lifestyles is totally WIMPY, isn't it? It's just so much easier not to criticize families who make choices you wouldn't make for yourself, right? Oh wait.
I have no opinion on the book itself since I haven't read it, but when someone (a whip-smart, uber-educated working mother, by the way) finds it banal, so tragically unhip and tiresome, that many of us evoke the same sentiment—that whatever is right for your family is whatever is right for your family, so mote it be—when we try and discuss parenting issues without passing judgement or starting flame wars it seems, I don't know . . . kind of like the attitude a surly teenager takes when their intent is to seem thrillingly controversial and cool, when in reality they're just being small-mindedly obnoxious.
We all have opinions, we've all made our choices to stay home or work or do a mix of both based on our individual situations and preferences and any number of outside factors. Why not respect the fact that there is going to be diversity in our choices? Because it's wimpy? Give me a break.
Beth wrote, ". . . while I may not totally understand them, I don't question your decisions either." Word to that.
